Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD)

This response was durable, with systemic immunosuppressive therapy withdrawn from two responders, and a further two free from steroids and tapering calcineurin inhibitors. All responders displayed a distinct immune phenotype characterized by higher levels of naïve T cells and B cells before treatment compared with the nonresponders, and a significantly higher fraction of CD31+ naïve CD4+ T cells. MSC treatment was associated with significant increases in naïve T cells, B cells, and Tregs 7 days after each infusion. Skin biopsies showed resolution of epidermal pathology. CXCL9 and CXCL10 showed differential responses in responder and nonresponder patients. Our data support the use of MSC infusions as treatment for steroid-refractory cGvHD with durable responses. We propose CXCL9 and CXCL10 as early biomarkers for responsiveness to MSC treatment.

Treatment of patients with de novo HR or SR aGVHD with low or high dose MSCTC-0010 was safe: the infusion was well-tolerated, and no TRAEs or ectopic tissue formation was observed. A clinical improvement was seen in about 70% patients, with 4 of 10 showing a complete response that may have been attributable to MSCTC-0010 infusions. These observations indicate safety of two different doses of MSCTC-0010, and suggest that the 10 × 10^6 cells/ kg dose be tested in an expanded randomized, controlled Phase 2 trial. Graphical abstract.

Survival at 12 months post randomisation was 53% (n=8) in the MSC and 77% (n=10) in the control arm. Deaths in the MSC-treated patients (within 12 months) occurred due to relapse (n=1), and aGVHD (n=6). Deaths in the control arm (within 12 months) were due to relapse (n=1), aGVHD (n=1) and cGVHD (n=1). Time to death was similar in both arms (post randomisation; median 93 days (range: 28–210) in MSC arm and 86 days (range: 46–295) in control arm). The use of 12-month overall survival as a primary endpoint is vulnerable to variations in treatment factors outside GVHD therapy.

Mean platelet engraftment time was significantly faster in the MSC compared with the control group (12.28 vs 13.29 days). The mean neutrophil engraftment time was comparable in both groups (10.76 ± 2.40 vs. 10.29 ± 1.72 days). Grade II or above acute GVHD was significantly decreased in the MSC compared with the control group (12% vs. 36%). There were no significant differences in relapse rate or overall survival between the groups.Mean platelet engraftment time was significantly faster in the MSC compared with the control group (12.28 vs 13.29 days). The mean neutrophil engraftment time was comparable in both groups (10.76 ± 2.40 vs. 10.29 ± 1.72 days). Grade II or above acute GVHD was significantly decreased in the MSC compared with the control group (12% vs. 36%). There were no significant differences in relapse rate or overall survival between the groups.

In conclusion, autologous and culture-recovered MSCs were safe in the setting of refractory GVHD following HCT for hematologic malignancy, and clinical responses were most notable in patients with acute GVHD.

The symptoms of 12 out of 22 patients abated after MSCs transplantation by intravenous injection, improving in the dry eye scores, ocular surface disease index scores and the Schirmer test results. The clinical improvements were accompanied by increasing level of CD8(+)CD28(-) T cells, but not CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells, in the 12 patients who were treated effectively. They had significantly higher levels of Th1 cytokines (interleukin (IL)-2 and interferon-γ) and lower levels of Th2 cytokines (IL-10 and IL-4). In addition, CD8(+) T cells were prone to differentiation into CD8(+)CD28(-) T cells after co-culture with MSCs in vitro. In conclusion, transfusion of MSCs improved the clinical symptoms in patients (54.55%) with refractory dry eye secondary to cGVHD. MSCs appear to exert their effects by triggering the generation of CD8(+)CD28(-) T cells, which may regulate the balance between Th1 and Th2.

Ninety-four percent of patients had an initial response to MSCs (77% complete response [CR] and 16% partial response [PR]). No infusional toxicities or ectopic tissue formations were reported. There was no difference with respect to safety or efficacy between the low and high MSC dose. In conclusion, MSCs can be infused safely into patients with aGVHD and induces response in a high proportion of GVHD patients.

Overall response rate, measured at 28 days after the last MSC injection, was 67.5%, with 27.5% complete response. The latter was significantly more frequent in patients exhibiting grade II GVHD as compared with higher grades (61.5% versus 11.1%, P = .002) and was borderline significant in children as compared with adults (46.7 versus 16.0%, P = .065). Overall survival at 1 and 2 years from the first MSC administration was 50.0% and 38.6%, with a median survival time of 1.1 years. In conclusion, MSC can be safely administered on top of conventional immunosuppression for steroid resistant GVHD treatment.